The Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces the daunting task of closing the PS40 billion funding shortfall.
The public finances of the country are under constant scrutiny due to economic pressures like inflation and slowing growth.
It is now up to you to decide whether to use new taxes to cover the deficit or to cut back on public services.
New taxes can solve PS40 billion in shortfall
The gap of PS40 billion follows concerns over a PS22-billion deficit.
Reeves’ proposals, with the fragile economy, will affect government departments, business and the general public.
Labour’s election manifesto, while expressing concern about the possibility of tax increases, has excluded any increase in VAT, National Insurance or income taxes. This leaves only limited options to raise funds.
An increase in employer contributions to National Insurance (NI), is one solution.
Reeves, while Labour has denied any increase for employees has indicated a willingness to add additional costs of NI on business.
It could be as simple as increasing the current NI rates on salaries (currently 13.8%), or introducing NI for employer-paid contributions to pensions at around 2%.
A 1% rise in salary could raise between PS17 and PS22 billion.
These measures combined could close a large part of the funding hole without affecting individual taxpayers.
Fuel tax hike to generate PS4 billion
A long overdue rise in the fuel tax is another possibility. This tax, which has been frozen for more than a decade now, could be reviewed, especially as fuel prices are declining.
The increase of 10p/litre could generate between PS4 and PS5 billion in revenue, although the transition to electric cars and the phase out of petrol and diesel vehicles by 2035 will limit the long-term revenues.
The Capital Gains Tax may be revised to align taxes on wealth that is not earned (such as dividends) and income tax rates.
CGT is currently lower than the income tax rate (20% on capital gains and 24%).
An increase in CGT could bring about 6 billion PS per year. Labour is cautious in its approach to taxing second homes, as it fears that this could discourage property sales.
Reeves may also target inheritance tax reform, which could include changes that aim to re-distribute wealth.
These adjustments may raise between PS3 and PS5 billion. However, some critics say that this could discourage investments or have wider economic consequences.
The public’s reaction is still mixed. In the face of economic uncertainty, many people are worried about their financial situation.
After years of austerity, the opposition will likely use the budget to attack the government. They may question the justice of adding more financial obligations.
As the budget nears, stakes are rising. It will determine not only the UK’s financial future, but also the political landscape in years to come.
Reeves’ ability to navigate the PS40-billion gap while maintaining public opinion and economic pressures will be watched closely.
The post UK Budget 2024: Which taxes could Rachel Reeves raise? This post may change as the updates unfold.
