World Economic Forum’s 56th Annual Meeting concluded in Davos on Friday night with the sobering realisation that international order, which governed global politics and finance since World War II, seems to be dead.
Over the course of those five days, a fragmented world emerged with competing power blocs. Technological disruption arrived faster than expected.
Financial markets have not yet priced in the potential upside or downside of the fundamental change.
Trump’s Greenland game reshapes Arctic Geopolitics
The meeting between President Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Wednesday produced “a framework of a deal for the future” regarding Greenland security and Arctic Security, which signaled an important shift in Washington’s view about its borders and alliances.
Although Trump did not threaten military force directly, his diplomatic message was very clear. NATO’s Danish allie is currently negotiating with how to maintain sovereignty.
Trump said he had “very nearly” reached a cease-fire agreement with Ukraine. He warned Russia and Ukraine to not negotiate, as it would be stupid.
It was a direct threat, as US support could be withdrawn if the peace talks fail.
Carney declared the rule-based order dead
Mark Carney, the Canadian prime minister, said what many world leaders have come to realize but very few are willing to admit: “The rules-based order no longer works.”
In his Tuesday address, he called the year 2026 “a rupture and not a transformation.” This is not just a short-term disruption in world operations but rather a fundamental change.
He was direct in his language. His language was blunt.
The countries want “more strategic autonomy” for energy, food and critical minerals.
Carney’s worst observation: “When rules are no longer protecting you, it is up to you to protect yourself.”
It is remarkable that no leader major at Davos advocated a return to the old system.
Discussions instead focused on positioning in a world of new regional blocs, including a US led bloc, a China led bloc, as well as a middle ground that is increasingly being contested, where countries such India, Indonesia and Brazil attempt to negotiate between rivals.
Musk’s AGI timeline is compressed, while Tesla makes a market wager
Elon Musk’s Davos debut delivered a timeline that can move the markets immediately.
Tesla’s CEO said that the company expects to have a Full Self-Driving Vehicle regulatory approval for Europe in February 2026, and will be selling humanoid robotics by next year.
He predicted that artificial general intelligence would arrive before the end of 2026 and surpass all humanity by 2030 or 2031.
Tesla stock soared by 3% after these comments.
Market implications are huge. Tesla’s valuation is based on the assumption that Optimus will become a business with millions of units.
Tesla could expand its market from just $2 trillion in 2027 to more than $100 trillion by then (replacing human workers across industries).
Jensen Huang’s $85 trillion question
Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang has reframed AI as not just speculative hype, but the “largest buildout of infrastructure in human history”, $85 trillion spread over 15 years.
The GPU spot price rises were not only for newer chips, but also for older models.
If commodity prices are rising in an alleged bubble, this signals not a surplus, but a shortage. Huang said this shows that demand is real and increasing.
The energy contracts have risen as the electricity constraint becomes a necessity; AI cannot be run without reliable power. The infrastructure layer has not yet reached its full potential, so capex is likely to accelerate.
IMF admits things that no one else wants to talk about
IMF chief Kristalina Georgeieva said that AI will disrupt 40% of global jobs in the next few years. In advanced economies it is 60%.
There is no framework in place for social support or transition of the workforce, retraining.
She warned that without coordinated retraining programmes, AI-driven displacement of jobs will cause political fragmentation, populism and even violence at a time when international cooperation is needed most.
Georgieva described the situation as “a tsunami striking the labor market,” however, the true crisis is the unequal distribution of opportunity.
She warned about what she called the “accordion of opportunity,” an increasing gap between wealthy countries with strong education systems, digital networks, and large capital reserves, who will be able to adapt to AI quickly, while less-developed nations lack resources for upskilling workers or investing in AI adoption.
The markets are pricing in a gradual transition and modest earnings growth.
The price of AI/robotics having a market so large that it dwarfs current values is not based on either extreme.
Which narrative will dominate the next earnings season?
The following post-WEF wrap: Trump Carney Musk Huang and the End of Old Playbook could be updated as new developments unfold
This site is for entertainment only. Click here to read more
